Samsung C270 vs QMobile QGuru vs Nokia 235 vs QMobile QGuru Plus vs Nokia 106 (2023) Comparison

Samsung C270

7999.0

QMobile QGuru

2299.0

Nokia 235

7400.0

QMobile QGuru Plus

2399.0

Nokia 106 (2023)

5999.0

Samsung C270, QMobile QGuru, Nokia 235, QMobile QGuru Plus and Nokia 106 (2023) comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Samsung C270, QMobile QGuru, Nokia 235, QMobile QGuru Plus and Nokia 106 (2023) camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Samsung C270

Rs 7,999

QMobile QGuru

Rs 2,299

Nokia 235

Rs 7,400

Nokia 106 (2023)

Rs 5,999
Network
Technology GSM N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band GSM 900 / 1800 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G Band N/A N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G Band N/A N/A 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC N/A 1, 3, 5, 8
Speed N/A N/A HSPA, LTE N/A HSPA, LTE
Body
Dimensions 88.1 x 45.6 x 19.8 mm (3.47 x 1.80 x 0.78 in) N/A 127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) N/A 121.5 x 50 x 14.4 mm (4.78 x 1.97 x 0.57 in)
Weight 74 g (2.61 oz) N/A - N/A 93 g (3.28 oz)
Sim Mini-SIM N/A Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) N/A Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Display
Type CSTN, 65K colors N/A TFT LCD N/A IPS LCD
Size 1.5 inches, 7.3 cm2 (~18.1% screen-to-body ratio) 1.8 Inches 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 1.8 Inches 1.8 inches, 10.0 cm2 (~16.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~121 ppi density) N/A 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) N/A 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~111 ppi density)
Platform
OS N/A Proprietary OS N/A Proprietary OS N/A
Chipset N/A N/A Unisoc T107 (22 nm) N/A N/A
CPU N/A N/A 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 N/A N/A
Memory
Card slot No N/A microSDHC N/A microSDHC
Internal 600 KB 1GB 1GBRAM 128MB 64MB RAM 1GB 1GBRAM Standard Storage
Main Camera
Single N/A NO 2 MP Smart Camera N/A
Features N/A N/A LED flash N/A N/A
Video N/A N/A Yes N/A N/A
Selfie Camera
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes
3.5mm-jack No N/A Yes N/A Yes
Comms
WLAN No N/A No N/A No
Bluetooth No N/A 5.0, A2DP, LE N/A 5.0, A2DP
GPS No N/A N/A N/A N/A
NFC N/A N/A No N/A No
Radio No N/A Wireless FM radio N/A Wireless FM radio
USB No N/A USB Type-C N/A microUSB 2.0
Features
Sensors N/A N/A No N/A N/A
Battery
Type Removable Li-Ion 750 mAh battery 1000 mAh Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 1000 mAh Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable
Misc
Colors Blue, Silver, Black, Red N/A Black, Blue, Purple N/A Charcoal, Ocean Blue

Samsung C270, QMobile QGuru, Nokia 235, QMobile QGuru Plus and Nokia 106 (2023) comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Samsung C270, QMobile QGuru, Nokia 235, QMobile QGuru Plus and Nokia 106 (2023) camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Samsung C270 Rs 7,999
QMobile QGuru Rs 2,299
Nokia 235 Rs 7,400
Nokia 106 (2023) Rs 5,999
Network
Technology
GSM N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band
GSM 900 / 1800 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G Band
N/A N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G Band
N/A N/A 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC N/A 1, 3, 5, 8
5G Band
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Speed
N/A N/A HSPA, LTE N/A HSPA, LTE
Body
Dimensions
88.1 x 45.6 x 19.8 mm (3.47 x 1.80 x 0.78 in) N/A 127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) N/A 121.5 x 50 x 14.4 mm (4.78 x 1.97 x 0.57 in)
Weight
74 g (2.61 oz) N/A - N/A 93 g (3.28 oz)
Build
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sim
Mini-SIM N/A Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) N/A Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Display
Type
CSTN, 65K colors N/A TFT LCD N/A IPS LCD
Size
1.5 inches, 7.3 cm2 (~18.1% screen-to-body ratio) 1.8 Inches 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 1.8 Inches 1.8 inches, 10.0 cm2 (~16.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution
128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~121 ppi density) N/A 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) N/A 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~111 ppi density)
Platform
OS
N/A Proprietary OS N/A Proprietary OS N/A
Chipset
N/A N/A Unisoc T107 (22 nm) N/A N/A
CPU
N/A N/A 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 N/A N/A
GPU
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Memory
Card slot
No N/A microSDHC N/A microSDHC
Internal
600 KB 1GB 1GBRAM 128MB 64MB RAM 1GB 1GBRAM Standard Storage
Main Camera
Single
N/A NO 2 MP Smart Camera N/A
Dual
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Triple
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Quad
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Features
N/A N/A LED flash N/A N/A
Video
N/A N/A Yes N/A N/A
Selfie Camera
Single
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Features
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Video
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sound
Loudspeaker
Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes
3.5mm-jack
No N/A Yes N/A Yes
Comms
WLAN
No N/A No N/A No
Bluetooth
No N/A 5.0, A2DP, LE N/A 5.0, A2DP
GPS
No N/A N/A N/A N/A
NFC
N/A N/A No N/A No
Radio
No N/A Wireless FM radio N/A Wireless FM radio
USB
No N/A USB Type-C N/A microUSB 2.0
Features
Sensors
N/A N/A No N/A N/A
Battery
Type
Removable Li-Ion 750 mAh battery 1000 mAh Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 1000 mAh Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable
Charging
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Misc
Colors
Blue, Silver, Black, Red N/A Black, Blue, Purple N/A Charcoal, Ocean Blue
Models
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Samsung C270, QMobile QGuru, Nokia 235, QMobile QGuru Plus and Nokia 106 (2023) comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Samsung C270, QMobile QGuru, Nokia 235, QMobile QGuru Plus and Nokia 106 (2023) camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Samsung C270

Rs 7,999

QMobile QGuru

Rs 2,299

Nokia 235

Rs 7,400

Nokia 106 (2023)

Rs 5,999
Network
Technology GSM N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band GSM 900 / 1800 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G Band N/A N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G Band N/A N/A 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC N/A 1, 3, 5, 8
Speed N/A N/A HSPA, LTE N/A HSPA, LTE
Body
Dimensions 88.1 x 45.6 x 19.8 mm (3.47 x 1.80 x 0.78 in) N/A 127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) N/A 121.5 x 50 x 14.4 mm (4.78 x 1.97 x 0.57 in)
Weight 74 g (2.61 oz) N/A - N/A 93 g (3.28 oz)
Sim Mini-SIM N/A Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) N/A Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Display
Type CSTN, 65K colors N/A TFT LCD N/A IPS LCD
Size 1.5 inches, 7.3 cm2 (~18.1% screen-to-body ratio) 1.8 Inches 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 1.8 Inches 1.8 inches, 10.0 cm2 (~16.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~121 ppi density) N/A 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) N/A 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~111 ppi density)
Platform
OS N/A Proprietary OS N/A Proprietary OS N/A
Chipset N/A N/A Unisoc T107 (22 nm) N/A N/A
CPU N/A N/A 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 N/A N/A
Memory
Card slot No N/A microSDHC N/A microSDHC
Internal 600 KB 1GB 1GBRAM 128MB 64MB RAM 1GB 1GBRAM Standard Storage
Main Camera
Single N/A NO 2 MP Smart Camera N/A
Features N/A N/A LED flash N/A N/A
Video N/A N/A Yes N/A N/A
Selfie Camera
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes
3.5mm-jack No N/A Yes N/A Yes
Comms
WLAN No N/A No N/A No
Bluetooth No N/A 5.0, A2DP, LE N/A 5.0, A2DP
GPS No N/A N/A N/A N/A
NFC N/A N/A No N/A No
Radio No N/A Wireless FM radio N/A Wireless FM radio
USB No N/A USB Type-C N/A microUSB 2.0
Features
Sensors N/A N/A No N/A N/A
Battery
Type Removable Li-Ion 750 mAh battery 1000 mAh Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 1000 mAh Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable
Misc
Colors Blue, Silver, Black, Red N/A Black, Blue, Purple N/A Charcoal, Ocean Blue

Mobile comparisons

90 Honor 90
VS
X9a Honor 90
View Comparison
Neo 5 Pro Sparx Neo 5 Pro
VS
S7 Sparx Neo 5 Pro
View Comparison
Spark 7 64GB Tecno Spark 7 64GB
VS
Spark 8 Tecno Spark 7 64GB
View Comparison
Blade V50 Design ZTE Blade V50 Design
VS
C12 Pro ZTE Blade V50 Design
View Comparison
Hot 40 Infinix Hot 40
VS
Hot 40 Pro Infinix Hot 40
View Comparison
Redmi A2 Plus Xiaomi Redmi A2 Plus
VS
C22 Xiaomi Redmi A2 Plus
View Comparison
Galaxy Z Flip 6 Samsung Galaxy Z ...
VS
Galaxy Z Fold 6 Samsung Galaxy Z ...
View Comparison
C22 Nokia C22
VS
Redmi A3 Nokia C22
View Comparison
V25e Vivo V25e
VS
V29e Vivo V25e
View Comparison
V29 Vivo V29
VS
V30 Pro Vivo V29
View Comparison