itel A50C vs QMobile i4i vs Nokia 235 vs Sparx Neo 6 Plus Comparison

itel A50C

14999.0

QMobile i4i

9999.0

Nokia 235

7400.0

Sparx Neo 6 Plus

19499.0

itel A50C, QMobile i4i , Nokia 235 and Sparx Neo 6 Plus comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare itel A50C, QMobile i4i , Nokia 235 and Sparx Neo 6 Plus camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

itel A50C

Rs 14,999

QMobile i4i

Rs 9,999

Nokia 235

Rs 7,400

Sparx Neo 6 Plus

Rs 19,499
Network
Technology GSM / HSPA / LTE N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM
3G Band HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 yes HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSPA
4G Band LTE N/A 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC LTE
Speed HSPA N/A HSPA, LTE N/A
Body
Dimensions 163.9 x 75.7 x 9.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) N/A 127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) N/A
Weight 192.6 g (6.81 oz) N/A - N/A
Sim Dual SIM N/A Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Nano SIM card, Dual SIM, Dual Standby
Display
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors TFT LCD IPS LCD,90 HZ
Size 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) 5 inches 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 6.52 Inches
Resolution 540 x 1208 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~202 ppi density) 720 x 1440 pixels 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) 720 X 1612 Pixels
Platform
OS Android 14 (Go edition) Android Pie 9.0 (Go edition) N/A Android 13
Chipset Unisoc T603 N/A Unisoc T107 (22 nm) N/A
CPU Octa-core 1.3GHz Quad core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 Octa-core
GPU N/A NO N/A N/A
Memory
Card slot microSDXC N/A microSDHC microSDXC
Internal 32GB 2GB RAM 8GB 1GBRAM 128MB 64MB RAM 64GB 2GB RAM
Main Camera
Single 8 MP, AF 5 MP 2 MP 13MP Dual Rear Camera
Features LED flash N/A LED flash Dual-LED flash
Video Yes 720p@30fps Yes 1080p@30fps
Selfie Camera
Single 5 MP Single N/A Single: 8MP
Video Yes 720p@30fps N/A 720p@30fps
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes N/A Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack Yes N/A Yes N/A
Comms
WLAN Yes Yes, Wi-Fi No Yes , WIFI
Bluetooth Yes N/A 5.0, A2DP, LE Yes
GPS N/A N/A N/A Yes
NFC No NO No No
Radio Unspecified N/A Wireless FM radio Yes
USB USB Type-C N/A USB Type-C USB Type-C
Features
Sensors Fingerprint (rear-mounted); unspecified sensors N/A No Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Type 4000 mAh N/A Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 5000 mah, non-removable
Charging N/A Long Lasting mAh battery N/A 10W
Misc
Colors Dawn Blue, Sapphire Black, Misty Aqua N/A Black, Blue, Purple Blue, Pink

itel A50C, QMobile i4i , Nokia 235 and Sparx Neo 6 Plus comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare itel A50C, QMobile i4i , Nokia 235 and Sparx Neo 6 Plus camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

itel A50C Rs 14,999
QMobile i4i Rs 9,999
Nokia 235 Rs 7,400
Sparx Neo 6 Plus Rs 19,499
Network
Technology
GSM / HSPA / LTE N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM
3G Band
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 yes HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSPA
4G Band
LTE N/A 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC LTE
5G Band
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Speed
HSPA N/A HSPA, LTE N/A
Body
Dimensions
163.9 x 75.7 x 9.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) N/A 127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) N/A
Weight
192.6 g (6.81 oz) N/A - N/A
Build
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sim
Dual SIM N/A Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Nano SIM card, Dual SIM, Dual Standby
Display
Type
IPS LCD IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors TFT LCD IPS LCD,90 HZ
Size
6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) 5 inches 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 6.52 Inches
Resolution
540 x 1208 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~202 ppi density) 720 x 1440 pixels 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) 720 X 1612 Pixels
Platform
OS
Android 14 (Go edition) Android Pie 9.0 (Go edition) N/A Android 13
Chipset
Unisoc T603 N/A Unisoc T107 (22 nm) N/A
CPU
Octa-core 1.3GHz Quad core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 Octa-core
GPU
N/A NO N/A N/A
Memory
Card slot
microSDXC N/A microSDHC microSDXC
Internal
32GB 2GB RAM 8GB 1GBRAM 128MB 64MB RAM 64GB 2GB RAM
Main Camera
Single
8 MP, AF 5 MP 2 MP 13MP Dual Rear Camera
Dual
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Triple
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Quad
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Features
LED flash N/A LED flash Dual-LED flash
Video
Yes 720p@30fps Yes 1080p@30fps
Selfie Camera
Single
5 MP Single N/A Single: 8MP
Features
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Video
Yes 720p@30fps N/A 720p@30fps
Sound
Loudspeaker
Yes N/A Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack
Yes N/A Yes N/A
Comms
WLAN
Yes Yes, Wi-Fi No Yes , WIFI
Bluetooth
Yes N/A 5.0, A2DP, LE Yes
GPS
N/A N/A N/A Yes
NFC
No NO No No
Radio
Unspecified N/A Wireless FM radio Yes
USB
USB Type-C N/A USB Type-C USB Type-C
Features
Sensors
Fingerprint (rear-mounted); unspecified sensors N/A No Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Type
4000 mAh N/A Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 5000 mah, non-removable
Charging
N/A Long Lasting mAh battery N/A 10W
Misc
Colors
Dawn Blue, Sapphire Black, Misty Aqua N/A Black, Blue, Purple Blue, Pink
Models
N/A N/A N/A N/A

itel A50C, QMobile i4i , Nokia 235 and Sparx Neo 6 Plus comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare itel A50C, QMobile i4i , Nokia 235 and Sparx Neo 6 Plus camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

itel A50C

Rs 14,999

QMobile i4i

Rs 9,999

Nokia 235

Rs 7,400

Sparx Neo 6 Plus

Rs 19,499
Network
Technology GSM / HSPA / LTE N/A GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM
3G Band HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 yes HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSPA
4G Band LTE N/A 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC LTE
Speed HSPA N/A HSPA, LTE N/A
Body
Dimensions 163.9 x 75.7 x 9.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) N/A 127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) N/A
Weight 192.6 g (6.81 oz) N/A - N/A
Sim Dual SIM N/A Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Nano SIM card, Dual SIM, Dual Standby
Display
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors TFT LCD IPS LCD,90 HZ
Size 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) 5 inches 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 6.52 Inches
Resolution 540 x 1208 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~202 ppi density) 720 x 1440 pixels 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) 720 X 1612 Pixels
Platform
OS Android 14 (Go edition) Android Pie 9.0 (Go edition) N/A Android 13
Chipset Unisoc T603 N/A Unisoc T107 (22 nm) N/A
CPU Octa-core 1.3GHz Quad core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 Octa-core
GPU N/A NO N/A N/A
Memory
Card slot microSDXC N/A microSDHC microSDXC
Internal 32GB 2GB RAM 8GB 1GBRAM 128MB 64MB RAM 64GB 2GB RAM
Main Camera
Single 8 MP, AF 5 MP 2 MP 13MP Dual Rear Camera
Features LED flash N/A LED flash Dual-LED flash
Video Yes 720p@30fps Yes 1080p@30fps
Selfie Camera
Single 5 MP Single N/A Single: 8MP
Video Yes 720p@30fps N/A 720p@30fps
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes N/A Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack Yes N/A Yes N/A
Comms
WLAN Yes Yes, Wi-Fi No Yes , WIFI
Bluetooth Yes N/A 5.0, A2DP, LE Yes
GPS N/A N/A N/A Yes
NFC No NO No No
Radio Unspecified N/A Wireless FM radio Yes
USB USB Type-C N/A USB Type-C USB Type-C
Features
Sensors Fingerprint (rear-mounted); unspecified sensors N/A No Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Type 4000 mAh N/A Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 5000 mah, non-removable
Charging N/A Long Lasting mAh battery N/A 10W
Misc
Colors Dawn Blue, Sapphire Black, Misty Aqua N/A Black, Blue, Purple Blue, Pink

Mobile comparisons

90 Honor 90
VS
X9a Honor 90
View Comparison
Neo 5 Pro Sparx Neo 5 Pro
VS
S7 Sparx Neo 5 Pro
View Comparison
Spark 7 64GB Tecno Spark 7 64GB
VS
Spark 8 Tecno Spark 7 64GB
View Comparison
Blade V50 Design ZTE Blade V50 Design
VS
C12 Pro ZTE Blade V50 Design
View Comparison
Hot 40 Infinix Hot 40
VS
Hot 40 Pro Infinix Hot 40
View Comparison
Redmi A2 Plus Xiaomi Redmi A2 Plus
VS
C22 Xiaomi Redmi A2 Plus
View Comparison
Galaxy Z Flip 6 Samsung Galaxy Z ...
VS
Galaxy Z Fold 6 Samsung Galaxy Z ...
View Comparison
C22 Nokia C22
VS
Redmi A3 Nokia C22
View Comparison
V25e Vivo V25e
VS
V29e Vivo V25e
View Comparison
V29 Vivo V29
VS
V30 Pro Vivo V29
View Comparison