Nokia 235 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x vs ZTE Blade A35 vs Realme Note 60x Comparison

Nokia 235

7400.0

Xiaomi Redmi A3x

18999.0

ZTE Blade A35

18999.0

Realme Note 60x

23999.0

Nokia 235, Xiaomi Redmi A3x, ZTE Blade A35 and Realme Note 60x comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Nokia 235, Xiaomi Redmi A3x, ZTE Blade A35 and Realme Note 60x camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Nokia 235

Rs 7,400

Xiaomi Redmi A3x

Rs 18,999

ZTE Blade A35

Rs 18,999

Realme Note 60x

Rs 23,999
Network
Technology GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Band HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC LTE N/A 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
Speed HSPA, LTE HSPA, LTE N/A HSPA, LTE
Body
Dimensions 127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) - 167.7 x 77.4x 8.5 mm 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.8 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.31 in)
Weight - - N/A 187 g (6.60 oz)
Build N/A Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, plastic frame N/A N/A
Sim Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Dual Sim, GSM+GSM Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Display
Type TFT LCD IPS LCD, 90Hz IPS LCD 90HZ IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits (peak)
Size 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) 6.75 inches 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) 720 x 1600 pixels 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density)
Platform
OS N/A Android 14, MIUI Android U / U (Go Edition) Android 14, Realme UI
Chipset Unisoc T107 (22 nm) Unisoc T603 Unisoc SC9863A1, Octa-Core 1.6GHz Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 Octa-core Octa-core Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU N/A N/A N/A Mali-G57
Memory
Card slot microSDHC microSDXC (dedicated slot) N/A microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal 128MB 64MB RAM 64GB 3GB RAM 64GB 4+8GB RAM 64GB 4GB RAM
Main Camera
Single 2 MP 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 0.08 MP (auxiliary lens) 8 MP 8 MP Auxiliary lens
Features LED flash LED flash, HDR LED flash, HDR LED flash, panorama
Video Yes 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps
Selfie Camera
Single N/A 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) Single 8 MP
Video N/A 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes Yes Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack Yes Yes Yes, 3.5 Yes
Comms
WLAN No Yes Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE Yes 5.2, A2DP LE, 5.0, A2DP, LE
GPS N/A N/A Yes with A-GPS N/A
NFC No No Yes (market/region dependent) No
Radio Wireless FM radio FM radio N/A Unspecified
USB USB Type-C USB Type-C N/A USB Type-C 2.0
Features
Sensors No Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors N/A Accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Type Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 5000 mAh, non-removable 5000mAh 5000 mAh
Charging N/A 10W wired 10W 10W wired
Misc
Colors Black, Blue, Purple Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Aurora Green N/A Wilderness Green, Marble Black
Models N/A N/A Starryblack, CloverGreen N/A

Nokia 235, Xiaomi Redmi A3x, ZTE Blade A35 and Realme Note 60x comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Nokia 235, Xiaomi Redmi A3x, ZTE Blade A35 and Realme Note 60x camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Nokia 235 Rs 7,400
Xiaomi Redmi A3x Rs 18,999
ZTE Blade A35 Rs 18,999
Realme Note 60x Rs 23,999
Network
Technology
GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Band
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G Band
1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC LTE N/A 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
5G Band
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Speed
HSPA, LTE HSPA, LTE N/A HSPA, LTE
Body
Dimensions
127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) - 167.7 x 77.4x 8.5 mm 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.8 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.31 in)
Weight
- - N/A 187 g (6.60 oz)
Build
N/A Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, plastic frame N/A N/A
Sim
Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Dual Sim, GSM+GSM Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Display
Type
TFT LCD IPS LCD, 90Hz IPS LCD 90HZ IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits (peak)
Size
2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) 6.75 inches 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution
240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) 720 x 1600 pixels 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density)
Platform
OS
N/A Android 14, MIUI Android U / U (Go Edition) Android 14, Realme UI
Chipset
Unisoc T107 (22 nm) Unisoc T603 Unisoc SC9863A1, Octa-Core 1.6GHz Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU
1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 Octa-core Octa-core Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU
N/A N/A N/A Mali-G57
Memory
Card slot
microSDHC microSDXC (dedicated slot) N/A microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal
128MB 64MB RAM 64GB 3GB RAM 64GB 4+8GB RAM 64GB 4GB RAM
Main Camera
Single
2 MP 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 0.08 MP (auxiliary lens) 8 MP 8 MP Auxiliary lens
Dual
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Triple
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Quad
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Features
LED flash LED flash, HDR LED flash, HDR LED flash, panorama
Video
Yes 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps
Selfie Camera
Single
N/A 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) Single 8 MP
Features
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Video
N/A 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps
Sound
Loudspeaker
Yes Yes Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack
Yes Yes Yes, 3.5 Yes
Comms
WLAN
No Yes Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth
5.0, A2DP, LE Yes 5.2, A2DP LE, 5.0, A2DP, LE
GPS
N/A N/A Yes with A-GPS N/A
NFC
No No Yes (market/region dependent) No
Radio
Wireless FM radio FM radio N/A Unspecified
USB
USB Type-C USB Type-C N/A USB Type-C 2.0
Features
Sensors
No Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors N/A Accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Type
Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 5000 mAh, non-removable 5000mAh 5000 mAh
Charging
N/A 10W wired 10W 10W wired
Misc
Colors
Black, Blue, Purple Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Aurora Green N/A Wilderness Green, Marble Black
Models
N/A N/A Starryblack, CloverGreen N/A

Nokia 235, Xiaomi Redmi A3x, ZTE Blade A35 and Realme Note 60x comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Nokia 235, Xiaomi Redmi A3x, ZTE Blade A35 and Realme Note 60x camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Nokia 235

Rs 7,400

Xiaomi Redmi A3x

Rs 18,999

ZTE Blade A35

Rs 18,999

Realme Note 60x

Rs 23,999
Network
Technology GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / HSPA / LTE
2G Band GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 N/A GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Band HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 N/A HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU, EMEA, APAC LTE N/A 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
Speed HSPA, LTE HSPA, LTE N/A HSPA, LTE
Body
Dimensions 127.3 x 54.2 x 11.6 mm (5.01 x 2.13 x 0.46 in) - 167.7 x 77.4x 8.5 mm 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.8 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.31 in)
Weight - - N/A 187 g (6.60 oz)
Build N/A Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, plastic frame N/A N/A
Sim Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Dual Sim, GSM+GSM Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Display
Type TFT LCD IPS LCD, 90Hz IPS LCD 90HZ IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits (peak)
Size 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~35.2% screen-to-body ratio) 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) 6.75 inches 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) 720 x 1600 pixels 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density)
Platform
OS N/A Android 14, MIUI Android U / U (Go Edition) Android 14, Realme UI
Chipset Unisoc T107 (22 nm) Unisoc T603 Unisoc SC9863A1, Octa-Core 1.6GHz Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 Octa-core Octa-core Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU N/A N/A N/A Mali-G57
Memory
Card slot microSDHC microSDXC (dedicated slot) N/A microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal 128MB 64MB RAM 64GB 3GB RAM 64GB 4+8GB RAM 64GB 4GB RAM
Main Camera
Single 2 MP 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 0.08 MP (auxiliary lens) 8 MP 8 MP Auxiliary lens
Features LED flash LED flash, HDR LED flash, HDR LED flash, panorama
Video Yes 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps
Selfie Camera
Single N/A 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) Single 8 MP
Video N/A 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes Yes Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack Yes Yes Yes, 3.5 Yes
Comms
WLAN No Yes Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE Yes 5.2, A2DP LE, 5.0, A2DP, LE
GPS N/A N/A Yes with A-GPS N/A
NFC No No Yes (market/region dependent) No
Radio Wireless FM radio FM radio N/A Unspecified
USB USB Type-C USB Type-C N/A USB Type-C 2.0
Features
Sensors No Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors N/A Accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Type Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable 5000 mAh, non-removable 5000mAh 5000 mAh
Charging N/A 10W wired 10W 10W wired
Misc
Colors Black, Blue, Purple Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Aurora Green N/A Wilderness Green, Marble Black
Models N/A N/A Starryblack, CloverGreen N/A

Mobile comparisons

90 Honor 90
VS
X9a Honor 90
View Comparison
Neo 5 Pro Sparx Neo 5 Pro
VS
S7 Sparx Neo 5 Pro
View Comparison
Spark 7 64GB Tecno Spark 7 64GB
VS
Spark 8 Tecno Spark 7 64GB
View Comparison
Blade V50 Design ZTE Blade V50 Design
VS
C12 Pro ZTE Blade V50 Design
View Comparison
Hot 40 Infinix Hot 40
VS
Hot 40 Pro Infinix Hot 40
View Comparison
Redmi A2 Plus Xiaomi Redmi A2 Plus
VS
C22 Xiaomi Redmi A2 Plus
View Comparison
Galaxy Z Flip 6 Samsung Galaxy Z ...
VS
Galaxy Z Fold 6 Samsung Galaxy Z ...
View Comparison
C22 Nokia C22
VS
Redmi A3 Nokia C22
View Comparison
V25e Vivo V25e
VS
V29e Vivo V25e
View Comparison
V29 Vivo V29
VS
V30 Pro Vivo V29
View Comparison